[ColorForth] Let's talk philosophy
- Subject: [ColorForth] Let's talk philosophy
- From: Jack Johnson <fragment@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Dec 2001 20:46:01 -0800
On Friday 30 November 2001 16:13, you wrote:
> >I fear that none of us will ever learn to do what Chuck does so adeptly.
> >He'll be the Tesla of computing.
>
> I love it when people praise Chuck in such a way that they put
> him on a pedastle high over the pathetic human race. Yes, I'm
> sure he does too.
Actually, I'm not putting him on a pedestal. In fact, if anything, it just
shows that you've already put Tesla on a pedestal.
Tesla is long since gone, now, and still people are trying to understand
where he was headed. Some people say he was a genius, some people say he was
crazy, and in the end it really doesn't matter which. He left us some
amazing technical contributions, and he provides an excellent example of
using perspective to solve a problem.
Chuck has this. Chuck has a nearly unique perspective on computing. And,
without a doubt, he is adept at what he does. Is this better? I'm certainly
not the one to say. I do know that though many of us can use Forth, no one
does it quite the way he does, and I, personally, see value in it. From
where I currently stand (or sit, as the case may be), I think it would make
me a better programmer if I could start to learn to approach problems the way
he does, but only time will tell.
I lived in Alaska for about fifteen years, and one day I was on a boat with
some friends on a river and saw this thing that looked like a waterwheel made
out of wood and net. My friend said that it was a fish wheel, that the
Athabaskans had used them for centuries, etc. Salmon swim up, the water runs
down, so why not let the water scoop the salmon out of the river and into a
pen? You can lie in the sun and catch a year's worth of fish in a week. You
know, spend some time with your kids.
When you see it in action, and you think of the toil that Western fishermen
have endured for millennia, even when they "cheated", it doesn't compare to
the simplicity and efficiency of a fish wheel. It took a different
perspective to come up with that specific solution to the problem, and it
seems ironic that nearly four millenia of "progress" didn't lead to a similar
conclusion.
So, when I read Jeff talk about ideas like "getting it wrong, forever", let's
just say I'm not suprised. In the pocketful of decades that we've been doing
this computing thing, I doubt even Chuck is doing it right (though I suspect
he's on to something).
-Jack
------------------------
To Unsubscribe from this list, send mail to Mdaemon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx with:
unsubscribe ColorForth
as the first and only line within the message body
Problems - List-Admin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Main ColorForth site - http://www.colorforth.com