Re: [colorforth] How is colorForth different from other Forths?

[vido@xxxxxxx]

On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 08:35:44PM -0800, Samuel A. Falvo II wrote:
> On Tuesday 16 December 2003 08:35 pm, Mark Slicker wrote:
> > What are you refering to here? In which cases has colorForth failed
> > miserably?
> 
> I'm referring to closed-minded people who neither understand, nor want to 
> understand, ColorForth, what makes it tick, and its philosophies.  As 
> far as which cases it has failed miserably, just ask anyone on 
> comp.lang.forth.

Well, what if you asked people on this list, rather than comp.lang.forth ?
ColorForth is an evolution of Forth by its original author. The philosophy
behind is certainly difficult to understand, but it deserves attention, too.
As for its "failure", in a very short timespan, it has attracted many people
who are willing to explore it, so it is far from being a failure.

Now if being interested in ColorForth is being "closed-minded", ok, let's
be "closed-minded" and happy with it.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: colorforth-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: colorforth-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Main web page - http://www.colorforth.com