Re: [colorforth] Eight instruction Turing-complete programming language
- Subject: Re: [colorforth] Eight instruction Turing-complete programming language
- From: "Roman Pavlyuk \(personal\)" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:55:13 +0200
Probably you missed mailing list, it's not ColorBrainFuck, it's ColorForth
mailing list :)
You can also look at Befunge family of languages (just google), they're yet
funnier.
Anyway, pinciples behing BF and Forth languages are a bit different -- first
thing that comes to my
brain (pardon for tautology) is that Forth allows you define your own words,
while in BF you just can use branch/calls.
So, I do not thing this list is a good place to discuff BF languages.
(I'm not an expert in BF though and might be mistaken)
BR,
Roman
----- Original Message -----
From: John A. Peters
To: colorforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Friday, February 27, 2004 8:28 PM
Subject: [colorforth] Eight instruction Turing-complete programming language
Tired of programming languages whose goal it is to make your life easier?
Feel like stretching the 'ol grey matter a bit? Why not try coding in
Brainfuck!
"Did you say Brainfuck?"
> "First make it work,
then sell it :)
> then improve it."
> Visit our website! http://come.to/hansoft
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: colorforth-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: colorforth-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Main web page - http://www.colorforth.com