Re: [colorforth] network stack

[Mark Slicker <maslicke@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 7 Apr 2004, Oninoshiko wrote:
>
> you have basicly confermed my interpritation, thank you. rather then use a
> linaer sussesion of protocols, why dont we have thsi be a listing of
> sibling protocols? then within the call have this listing of its children.
> are there any drawbacks to this method that i sould know about (other then
> having to rewrite some of the exsisting code)?
>

What I had mind is a simple branch.

udp? if +tcp ... ; then udp ...

Perhaps udp would simply add 8, since it is already known to be udp.

Of course there are an infinite number of solutions to any problem, the
challenge is to find the right (or best) solution.

Mark

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: colorforth-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: colorforth-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Main web page - http://www.colorforth.com