Re: [colorforth] TCP State Engine
- Subject: Re: [colorforth] TCP State Engine
- From: postmaster <postmaster@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Apr 2004 12:05:03 -0500
- Organization: Chaos Solutions L.C.
On Sunday 18 April 2004 10:47 am, John A. Peters wrote:
> I hope we don't fill this space with the likes of
> "He said - She said". Chuck Moore and others
> stopped reading CLF because of the noise to signal ratio.
>
> Why not try to code it and post your attempts,
> or failing that, try to specify it and or ask questions
> and try to learn what is needed?
Yes, I think this thread has run it's course.
Although it hasn't degenerated into foul language or personal insults, which
would have seen it stopped immediately, there doesn't seem to be any more
value in the back and forth (pun intended) comments.
Please remember that there are other people on this list who are also on many
other mailing lists and won't appreciate these prolonged banterings with
little or no content.
Although it's instructive to see how people think and misinterpret issues and
statements, it's really a lesson in how not to post on a technical mailing
list.
How about talking about code or better still, actually creating code for TCP,
web servers and web browsers instead of just talking about how it can't be
done in x number of screens.
To the protaganists - If you want to continue, take it to personal email.
Regards...list admin
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: colorforth-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> For additional commands, e-mail: colorforth-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Main web page - http://www.colorforth.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: colorforth-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: colorforth-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Main web page - http://www.colorforth.com