RE: [colorforth] meta-compiler

["howerd.oakford" <howerd.oakford@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hoi Albert,

I can see your thought processes going in exactly the same direction as mine
;)

If the editor is in the kernel, adding a new colour token requires a new
kernel...
Solution : write the editor in colorForth. This is largely done.
So, yes, the editor in the kernel is restricting, and so could be construed
as a negative feature ( IMHO ).

I have in fact added a new colour token - blue - to the cf version of the
editor, just to see how easy it is to do. Its easy.
As for what the compiler does with it - we need the compiler to be written
in colorForth too...

Perhaps Mark could confirm, but I don't think that his colorForth compiler
requires any new colour tokens, although he is patching the behaviour of the
magenta variable.

English tutorial : "historical accident" has only a slight negative
connotation, as in something that happened by chance in the past, and not as
in "road traffic accident" which is totally negative.

Groetjes

Howerd

-----Original Message-----
From: Albert van der Horst [mailto:albert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: 31 May 2005 10:42
To: colorforth@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [colorforth] meta-compiler


On Mon, May 30, 2005 at 02:34:03PM -0400, Mark Slicker wrote:
> On Mon, 30 May 2005, Albert van der Horst wrote:
>
> >I miss some premises here, that maybe are implicit.
> >So what is the idea about> >- where is the source, presumably in
colorforth blocks?
>
> Yes colorForth source.
>
> >- how to handle bootcode.
> >
> >But there is a problem here. The editor is in colorforth. So the
> >new colorforth may require tricks from the editor that are not yet
> >present (say e.g. a new color). Right?
> >
>
> I'm not sure what you're asking. The editor and compiler both agree on the
> source format, other than this there is little interaction between the
> two. The editor can easily be taken out of the kernel, and in fact Chuck
> calls it a historical accident the editor currently resides in the kernel.

A historical accident, is that a negative assessment, i.e. something
that preferably be changed? (This is just my understanding of English).

About my question. Suppose you want to add a color. Now the source
has to be generated by the old colorforth. So its editor must know
that new color?

<SNIP>
Groetjes Albert
--
Albert van der Horst,Oranjestr 8,3511 RA UTRECHT,THE NETHERLANDS
Economic growth -- like all pyramid schemes -- ultimately falters.
albert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://home.hccnet.nl/a.w.m.van.der.horst

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: colorforth-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: colorforth-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Main web page - http://www.colorforth.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: colorforth-unsubscribe@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
For additional commands, e-mail: colorforth-help@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Main web page - http://www.colorforth.com