Re: areas of study for use in misc mup21 and f21 applications
- To: garyl@xxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: areas of study for use in misc mup21 and f21 applications
- From: dcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Dan C. Rinnert)
- Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 19:04:00 -0400
- Cc: MISC-request
- Old-Date: 14 Nov 1997 23:14:15 GMT
- Organization: Canville Virtual Village
- Reply-To: dcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx
- ReSent-Date: Sun, 16 Nov 1997 14:01:39 -0500 (EST)
- ReSent-From: Penio Penev <penev@xxxxxxx>
- ReSent-Message-ID: <Pine.SGI.3.96.971116140139.2459F@venezia.rockefeller.edu>
- ReSent-To: MISC
garyl@nvmedia.com,Internet writes:
>But now one F21 has many
>times the power of a PDP 8 or so and it is not hard to see one person
>using 10 F21s for a price comparable to a midprice pc clone. I would
>like to see experimental systems in which one F21 is used for the code
>development and others are used for other operating system functions,
>such as object oriented disk system, flowchart display, debugging tools,
>print rendering, and graphics display.
> Any thoughts on these or other subjects?
What about using a RISC processor, such as the PowerPC, as a "master"
processor, with several F21s as "slaves"? The PowerPC would handle the core
OS functions, and route/delegate other processes to best be handled, either
by itself or one or more of the F21s.
Or, perhaps the PowerPC could act as a server, while the F21s act as clients?
On second thought, perhaps the former is a better way.