Re: Re: Re: intro
- To: misc
- Subject: Re: Re: Re: intro
- From: dcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx (Dan C. Rinnert)
- Date: 16 Nov 1997 21:40:58 GMT
- Organization: Canville Virtual Village
- Reply-To: dcr@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Kragen \ Skewed\ Sitaker,kragen@dnaco.net,Internet writes:
>If these become common enough, we *can* have a GNU processor architecture.
>Then we just need to loosen intellectual-property restrictions enough that
>it's legal for people other than Intel to make CPUs.
I'm not sure I follow what you're saying. It *is* legal for people other
than Intel to make CPUs. AMD, Cyrix, IBM and Motorola are among the
non-Intel alternatives. And, in my experience, the non-Intel CPUs are often
the better ones.