home .. forth .. misc mail list archive ..

Re: SHARC



I'd beg to differ.  I wrote a Forth for the ADSP2181, the SHARC's
16 bit sibling, and it was really, really fast.  The '2181 at
33 MHz runs Forth about as fast as an 8 MHz RTX2001.

And I was generating 640x350 monochrome video at the same time.

-Dave

On Tue, 20 Jul 1999, vic plichota wrote:

> >Out of curiousity: is the SHARC architecture
> >suitable for Forth?
> 
> No, it is not.  If you don't believe me, then try it sometime, and
> you'll see what I mean...  it can be done, but it's a bitch -- fussy
> and complicated.
> 
> 
> >(Due to it's limited on-die memory
> 
> Bullshit -- even the cheapest SHARC variant is blessed with copious
> on-chip RAM -- at least for my purposes.
> 
> 
> RTFM   - vic
> 
>