Re: networked processors
> Well IMHO the is no single topology that fit's all. What you could do
> is have a programmable switching scheme so that you configure pipelines,
> n dimensional arrays etc.
Although the F21 is supposed to be for special purpose situations... I lean
towards general purpose processing. Wouldn't a configurable topology raise
a lot of overhead in multithreading? (Assuming an OS would allow it once it
was booted)
>
> Not wanting to get into the warfare but i agree with Stephen Pelc (to a
> degree). Supporting C is not essential, but it's a good idea. lo' cost
> comes from hi' volume. Supporting (arguably) the most common language
> will help with the volume.
My personal MISC processor probably would be able to support C, but only as
a matter of coincidence and not intention.
