Re: F21 docs, + an administrative question
- To: <misc>, "Mike Simon" <msimon@xxxxxxx>
- Subject: Re: F21 docs, + an administrative question
- From: "vic plichota" <atsvap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2000 22:55:18 -0400
- References: <4.3.2.7.0.20000605182851.00aa6d00@xta.com>
> I have noted some complaints in this list about the F21 docs.
> I think the criticism is unjustified.
What is wrong with asking for a correct pinout, and something
resembling a timing diagram? If UTI wants to sell this silicon, then
I think that it behooves 'em to publish, or perish. If I am out of
date wrt the state of F21 doc, it is because no-one directed my
attention to the correct URL.
I do not fault creativity, and frankly I approve of
flying-in-the-face-of-the-establishment, but selling a component
req's hard engineering data before a system-builder can specify it
with any confidence (as opposed to a hobby or leap of faith).
> I have found the doc adequate to design this chip
> on a board including software.
Successfully? Worked 1st time, and every time it was powered-up?
PS does anyone know if this list supports attached binaries?
cheers - vic